2000 Mazda B2500 vs. 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2000 Mazda B2500 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 4,246 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mazda B2500 weights approximately 340 kg more than 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Because 2000 Mazda B2500 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda B2500 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mazda B2500 | 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
| Make | Mazda | Studebaker |
| Model | B2500 | Sky Hawk |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1959 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 4246 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 82 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1740 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2980 mm |
