2000 Mazda B2500 vs. 2006 Opel Antara
To start off, 2006 Opel Antara is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mazda B2500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mazda B2500 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mazda B2500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Opel Antara (212 HP @ 1400 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 2000 Mazda B2500. (82 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Opel Antara should accelerate faster than 2000 Mazda B2500.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Opel Antara (542 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 348 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mazda B2500. (194 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Opel Antara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mazda B2500. 2006 Opel Antara has automatic transmission and 2000 Mazda B2500 has manual transmission. 2000 Mazda B2500 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Opel Antara will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mazda B2500 | 2006 Opel Antara | |
Make | Mazda | Opel |
Model | B2500 | Antara |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1899 cc |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Torque | 194 Nm | 542 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1760 mm |