2000 Mazda B2500 vs. 2011 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2011 Ford Ecosport is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mazda B2500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mazda B2500 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mazda B2500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 61 more horse power than 2000 Mazda B2500. (82 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 2000 Mazda B2500.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 2000 Mazda B2500 has manual transmission. 2000 Mazda B2500 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mazda B2500 | 2011 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | B2500 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2490 mm |