2000 Mazda Laputa vs. 1946 Skoda Polular 995
To start off, 2000 Mazda Laputa is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Skoda Polular 995. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Skoda Polular 995 would be higher. At 995 cc (4 cylinders), 1946 Skoda Polular 995 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mazda Laputa (52 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1946 Skoda Polular 995. (22 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mazda Laputa should accelerate faster than 1946 Skoda Polular 995. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mazda Laputa weights approximately 20 kg more than 1946 Skoda Polular 995. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mazda Laputa | 1946 Skoda Polular 995 | |
| Make | Mazda | Skoda |
| Model | Laputa | Polular 995 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1946 |
| Engine Size | 658 cc | 995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 52 HP | 22 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 730 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 3810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1410 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1490 mm |
