2000 Mazda Laputa vs. 1978 Toyota Celica

To start off, 2000 Mazda Laputa is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,586 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Toyota Celica (86 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2000 Mazda Laputa. (52 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 2000 Mazda Laputa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Toyota Celica weights approximately 245 kg more than 2000 Mazda Laputa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1978 Toyota Celica is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Toyota Celica. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda Laputa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Toyota Celica (118 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mazda Laputa. (63 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1978 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mazda Laputa.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Mazda Laputa 1978 Toyota Celica
Make Mazda Toyota
Model Laputa Celica
Year Released 2000 1978
Body Type Hatchback Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 658 cc 1586 cc
Engine Cylinders 3 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 52 HP 86 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 63 Nm 118 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 68 mm 85 mm
Engine Stroke Size 60.4 mm 70 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 9.4:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 750 kg 995 kg
Vehicle Length 3400 mm 4340 mm
Vehicle Width 1480 mm 1640 mm
Vehicle Height 1550 mm 1330 mm
Wheelbase Size 2370 mm 2510 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 30 L 60 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]