2000 Mazda Laputa vs. 1996 Proton 400
To start off, 2000 Mazda Laputa is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 400 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Proton 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Proton 400 (67 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2000 Mazda Laputa. (52 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Proton 400 should accelerate faster than 2000 Mazda Laputa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Proton 400 weights approximately 365 kg more than 2000 Mazda Laputa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Proton 400 (123 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mazda Laputa. (63 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1996 Proton 400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mazda Laputa.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mazda Laputa | 1996 Proton 400 | |
Make | Mazda | Proton |
Model | Laputa | 400 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 658 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 52 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 63 Nm | 123 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2510 mm |