2000 Mazda Premacy vs. 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2000 Mazda Premacy is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,259 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mazda Premacy | 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Premacy | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2259 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2680 mm |
