2000 MCC ForTwo vs. 1953 Simca Aronde
To start off, 2000 MCC ForTwo is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Simca Aronde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Simca Aronde would be higher. At 1,288 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Simca Aronde is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 44 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Simca Aronde weights approximately 300 kg more than 2000 MCC ForTwo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Simca Aronde (88 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 MCC ForTwo. (70 Nm). This means 1953 Simca Aronde will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 MCC ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 MCC ForTwo | 1953 Simca Aronde | |
| Make | MCC | Simca |
| Model | ForTwo | Aronde |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 597 cc | 1288 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Torque | 70 Nm | 88 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 980 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4020 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2450 mm |
