2000 MCC ForTwo vs. 1966 Toyota Corolla
To start off, 2000 MCC ForTwo is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Toyota Corolla. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Toyota Corolla would be higher. At 1,077 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Toyota Corolla is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Toyota Corolla (59 HP) has 19 more horse power than 2000 MCC ForTwo. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Toyota Corolla should accelerate faster than 2000 MCC ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 MCC ForTwo weights approximately 10 kg more than 1966 Toyota Corolla.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 MCC ForTwo (100 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Toyota Corolla. (77 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2000 MCC ForTwo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Toyota Corolla.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 MCC ForTwo | 1966 Toyota Corolla | |
| Make | MCC | Toyota |
| Model | ForTwo | Corolla |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 799 cc | 1077 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 100 Nm | 77 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2290 mm |
