2000 MCC ForTwo vs. 1980 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2000 MCC ForTwo is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,951 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Nissan Bluebird (59 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2000 MCC ForTwo. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Nissan Bluebird should accelerate faster than 2000 MCC ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 510 kg more than 2000 MCC ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Nissan Bluebird (116 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 MCC ForTwo. (70 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1980 Nissan Bluebird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 MCC ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
2000 MCC ForTwo | 1980 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | MCC | Nissan |
Model | ForTwo | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2000 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 597 cc | 1951 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 70 Nm | 116 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 1190 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2530 mm |