2000 MCC ForTwo vs. 1986 Plymouth Voyager
To start off, 2000 MCC ForTwo is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Plymouth Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Plymouth Voyager would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Plymouth Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Plymouth Voyager weights approximately 620 kg more than 2000 MCC ForTwo.
Because 2000 MCC ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 MCC ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Plymouth Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 MCC ForTwo | 1986 Plymouth Voyager | |
| Make | MCC | Plymouth |
| Model | ForTwo | Voyager |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1986 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 799 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2860 mm |
