2000 MCC ForTwo vs. 1999 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 MCC ForTwo is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Renault Clio would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Renault Clio weights approximately 205 kg more than 2000 MCC ForTwo.
Because 2000 MCC ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 MCC ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 MCC ForTwo | 1999 Renault Clio | |
| Make | MCC | Renault |
| Model | ForTwo | Clio |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1999 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2770 mm |
