2000 MCC ForTwo vs. 2003 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 MCC ForTwo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 MCC ForTwo would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 2000 MCC ForTwo. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 2000 MCC ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 MCC ForTwo weights approximately 240 kg more than 2003 Westfield XTR 2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 MCC ForTwo | 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | MCC | Westfield |
| Model | ForTwo | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 597 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2320 mm |
