2000 MCC ForTwo vs. 2012 Chrysler Ypsilon
To start off, 2012 Chrysler Ypsilon is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 MCC ForTwo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 MCC ForTwo would be higher. At 1,242 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chrysler Ypsilon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chrysler Ypsilon (68 HP) has 24 more horse power than 2000 MCC ForTwo. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chrysler Ypsilon should accelerate faster than 2000 MCC ForTwo.
Because 2000 MCC ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 MCC ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chrysler Ypsilon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 MCC ForTwo | 2012 Chrysler Ypsilon | |
Make | MCC | Chrysler |
Model | ForTwo | Ypsilon |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 597 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2390 mm |