2000 MCC ForTwo vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 MCC ForTwo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 MCC ForTwo would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac XTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac XTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 274 more horse power than 2000 MCC ForTwo. (40 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS should accelerate faster than 2000 MCC ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac XTS weights approximately 1087 kg more than 2000 MCC ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 MCC ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 MCC ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac XTS (358 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 MCC ForTwo. (100 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac XTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 MCC ForTwo. 2013 Cadillac XTS has automatic transmission and 2000 MCC ForTwo has manual transmission. 2000 MCC ForTwo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac XTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 MCC ForTwo | 2013 Cadillac XTS | |
Make | MCC | Cadillac |
Model | ForTwo | XTS |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 799 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 40 HP | 314 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 100 Nm | 358 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1817 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 5131 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1852 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2831 mm |