2000 Mercedes-Benz A vs. 1962 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz A is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercedes-Benz A (90 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercedes-Benz A should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercedes-Benz A weights approximately 165 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mercedes-Benz A (140 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2000 Mercedes-Benz A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mercedes-Benz A | 1962 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Nissan |
| Model | A | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1095 kg | 930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2540 mm |
