2000 Mercedes-Benz A vs. 1965 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz A is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercedes-Benz A (90 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercedes-Benz A should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercedes-Benz A weights approximately 195 kg more than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Mercedes-Benz A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mercedes-Benz A | 1965 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Nissan |
| Model | A | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1189 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1095 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2290 mm |
