2000 Mercedes-Benz C vs. 1982 Volvo 360
To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volvo 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volvo 360 would be higher. At 2,148 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercedes-Benz C (141 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1982 Volvo 360. (101 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1982 Volvo 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 470 kg more than 1982 Volvo 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mercedes-Benz C (315 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Volvo 360. (163 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2000 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Volvo 360.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mercedes-Benz C | 1982 Volvo 360 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volvo |
Model | C | 360 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2148 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 315 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.3 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 69 L | 58 L |