2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR vs. 1982 Mazda 626
To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 4,996 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mazda 626 weights approximately 45 kg more than 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Mazda 626 has automatic transmission and 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR has manual transmission. 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Mazda 626 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | 1982 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mazda |
| Model | CLK GTR | 626 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4996 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1045 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4310 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2520 mm |
