2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Galant
To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Galant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Galant would be higher. At 4,996 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Galant weights approximately 210 kg more than 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR.
Because 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Galant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | 1996 Mitsubishi Galant | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mitsubishi |
| Model | CLK GTR | Galant |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4996 cc | 1832 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 114 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2640 mm |
