2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR vs. 2002 MG TF
To start off, 2002 MG TF is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR would be higher. At 4,996 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 MG TF weights approximately 100 kg more than 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | 2002 MG TF | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | MG |
| Model | CLK GTR | TF |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Middle | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4996 cc | 1588 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 114 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2380 mm |
