2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR vs. 2003 Mitsubishi Magna
To start off, 2003 Mitsubishi Magna is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR would be higher. At 4,996 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mitsubishi Magna weights approximately 370 kg more than 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR.
Because 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mitsubishi Magna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | 2003 Mitsubishi Magna | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mitsubishi |
| Model | CLK GTR | Magna |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4996 cc | 2351 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 141 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1370 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2730 mm |
