2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1486 kg more than 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR.
Because 2013 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Toyota Tundra has automatic transmission and 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR has manual transmission. 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Toyota Tundra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Toyota |
| Model | CLK GTR | Tundra |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4996 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 376 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 2486 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 5810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1940 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3700 mm |
