2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C
To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK (367 HP) has 278 more horse power than 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 72 kg more than 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | CLK | 6C |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1940 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5500 cc | 2442 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 367 HP | 89 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1428 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 77 L |
