2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1952 Talbot Baby
To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK (367 HP) has 259 more horse power than 1952 Talbot Baby. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1952 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Talbot Baby weights approximately 222 kg more than 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1952 Talbot Baby | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Talbot |
| Model | CLK | Baby |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1952 |
| Engine Size | 5500 cc | 2690 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 367 HP | 108 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1428 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 3130 mm |
