2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1955 Renault Juva
To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Renault Juva would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK (367 HP) has 347 more horse power than 1955 Renault Juva. (20 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1955 Renault Juva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 483 kg more than 1955 Renault Juva. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1955 Renault Juva | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Renault |
| Model | CLK | Juva |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 5500 cc | 747 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 367 HP | 20 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1428 kg | 945 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1410 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2360 mm |
