2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1974 Mini Clubman
To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mini Clubman would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK (367 HP) has 329 more horse power than 1974 Mini Clubman. (38 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1974 Mini Clubman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 744 kg more than 1974 Mini Clubman. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Mini Clubman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1974 Mini Clubman | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mini |
Model | CLK | Clubman |
Year Released | 2000 | 1974 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5500 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 367 HP | 38 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1428 kg | 684 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2040 mm |