2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1978 Monteverdi Sahara
To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Monteverdi Sahara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Monteverdi Sahara would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK (367 HP) has 286 more horse power than 1978 Monteverdi Sahara. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1978 Monteverdi Sahara.
Because 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Monteverdi Sahara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1978 Monteverdi Sahara has automatic transmission and 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK has manual transmission. 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1978 Monteverdi Sahara will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1978 Monteverdi Sahara | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Monteverdi |
| Model | CLK | Sahara |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5500 cc | 3253 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 367 HP | 81 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2550 mm |
