2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1996 Suzuki Swift

To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Suzuki Swift. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Suzuki Swift would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK (367 HP) has 312 more horse power than 1996 Suzuki Swift. (55 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1996 Suzuki Swift. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 748 kg more than 1996 Suzuki Swift. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Suzuki Swift, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK 1996 Suzuki Swift
Make Mercedes-Benz Suzuki
Model CLK Swift
Year Released 2000 1996
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5500 cc 993 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 367 HP 55 HP
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1428 kg 680 kg
Vehicle Length 4580 mm 3720 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1580 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2780 mm 2270 mm