2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2004 Spyker C8
To start off, 2004 Spyker C8 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK would be higher. At 3,999 cc, 2004 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 150 kg more than 2004 Spyker C8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 2004 Spyker C8 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Spyker |
Model | CLK | C8 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3999 cc |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 100 L |