2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2006 Volkswagen Polo

To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK (367 HP) has 267 more horse power than 2006 Volkswagen Polo. (100 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 2006 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 224 kg more than 2006 Volkswagen Polo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK 2006 Volkswagen Polo
Make Mercedes-Benz Volkswagen
Model CLK Polo
Year Released 2000 2006
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5500 cc 1598 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 367 HP 100 HP
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1428 kg 1204 kg
Vehicle Length 4580 mm 3920 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2780 mm 2470 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 88 L 45 L