2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2011 Chevrolet HHR
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK (367 HP) has 212 more horse power than 2011 Chevrolet HHR. (155 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 2011 Chevrolet HHR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet HHR weights approximately 3 kg more than 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Because 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 2011 Chevrolet HHR | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Chevrolet |
| Model | CLK | HHR |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5500 cc | 2200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 367 HP | 155 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1428 kg | 1431 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4475 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1755 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1603 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2629 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 61 L |
