2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz S
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz S is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK would be higher. Both 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK and 2013 Mercedes-Benz S are equipped with a 5,500 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz S (529 HP) has 162 more horse power than 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (367 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz S should accelerate faster than 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mercedes-Benz S weights approximately 742 kg more than 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 2013 Mercedes-Benz S | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | CLK | S |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5500 cc | 5500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 367 HP | 529 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1428 kg | 2170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2120 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1488 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 3165 mm |