2000 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1962 Wartburg 311
To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Wartburg 311. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Wartburg 311 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercedes-Benz E (161 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1962 Wartburg 311. (36 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1962 Wartburg 311. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 640 kg more than 1962 Wartburg 311. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mercedes-Benz E (230 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Wartburg 311. (82 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2000 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Wartburg 311.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mercedes-Benz E | 1962 Wartburg 311 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Wartburg |
Model | E | 311 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 230 Nm | 82 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89.9 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.7 mm | 78 mm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2970 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 43 L |