2000 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. Both 2000 Mercedes-Benz E and 1966 Triumph 2000 are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercedes-Benz E (160 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 430 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mercedes-Benz E (230 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mercedes-Benz E | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Triumph |
Model | E | 2000 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 230 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.7 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 64 L |