2000 Mercedes-Benz ML vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix

To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mercedes-Benz ML. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mercedes-Benz ML would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Matrix (156 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2000 Mercedes-Benz ML. (94 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 2000 Mercedes-Benz ML. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 75 kg more than 2000 Mercedes-Benz ML. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mercedes-Benz ML (441 Nm) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Toyota Matrix. (220 Nm). This means 2000 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Toyota Matrix.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Mercedes-Benz ML 2013 Toyota Matrix
Make Mercedes-Benz Toyota
Model ML Matrix
Year Released 2000 2013
Body Type SUV Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4261 cc 2400 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 94 HP 156 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 441 Nm 220 Nm
Drive Type 4WD AWD
Transmission Type Automatic 4-speed automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1405 kg 1480 kg
Vehicle Length 4640 mm 4365 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1765 mm
Vehicle Height 1830 mm 1560 mm
Wheelbase Size 2720 mm 2600 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 62 L 50 L