2000 Mercedes-Benz ML vs. 2013 Volvo S60
To start off, 2013 Volvo S60 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mercedes-Benz ML. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mercedes-Benz ML would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo S60 (321 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 227 more horse power than 2000 Mercedes-Benz ML. (94 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 2000 Mercedes-Benz ML. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo S60 weights approximately 357 kg more than 2000 Mercedes-Benz ML. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo S60 (480 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mercedes-Benz ML. (441 Nm). This means 2013 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mercedes-Benz ML.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mercedes-Benz ML | 2013 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volvo |
Model | ML | S60 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4261 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | W |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 321 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 441 Nm | 480 Nm |
Top Speed | 209 km/hour | 240 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1405 kg | 1762 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2097 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1484 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2776 mm |