2000 Mercedes-Benz S vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz S is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz S is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercedes-Benz S weights approximately 149 kg more than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2000 Mercedes-Benz S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Mercedes-Benz S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mercedes-Benz S | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Oldsmobile |
| Model | S | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4965 cc | 2568 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1326 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6160 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4090 mm | 2680 mm |
