2000 Mercedes-Benz SL vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercedes-Benz SL (217 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1983 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Ranger.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Mercedes-Benz SL. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1983 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 2000 Mercedes-Benz SL has manual transmission. 2000 Mercedes-Benz SL will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1983 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mercedes-Benz SL | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Ford |
Model | SL | Ranger |
Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4690 mm |