2000 Mercedes-Benz SLK vs. 1952 Talbot Baby
To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz SLK is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercedes-Benz SLK (194 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1952 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercedes-Benz SLK should accelerate faster than 1952 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercedes-Benz SLK weights approximately 400 kg more than 1952 Talbot Baby. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mercedes-Benz SLK | 1952 Talbot Baby | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Talbot |
| Model | SLK | Baby |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1952 |
| Engine Size | 2295 cc | 2690 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 194 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2050 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3130 mm |
