2000 Mercedes-Benz SLK vs. 1963 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz SLK is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz SLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercedes-Benz SLK (190 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercedes-Benz SLK should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercedes-Benz SLK weights approximately 340 kg more than 1963 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mercedes-Benz SLK (271 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2000 Mercedes-Benz SLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mercedes-Benz SLK | 1963 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Nissan |
| Model | SLK | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3199 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 271 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1425 kg | 1085 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2540 mm |
