2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision vs. 1963 Pontiac Tempest
To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 3,524 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Pontiac Tempest (118 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision. (94 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Pontiac Tempest should accelerate faster than 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Pontiac Tempest weights approximately 400 kg more than 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision | 1963 Pontiac Tempest | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Pontiac |
| Model | Vision | Tempest |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1899 cc | 3524 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1350 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2930 mm |
