2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision would be higher. At 1,899 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volkswagen Polo (101 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision. (94 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision.
Because 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision (189 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. (155 Nm). This means 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision | 2005 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volkswagen |
Model | Vision | Polo |
Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1899 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 189 Nm | 155 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 55 L |