2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision vs. 2006 Holden UTE
To start off, 2006 Holden UTE is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision. (94 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Holden UTE weights approximately 550 kg more than 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden UTE (305 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision. (189 Nm). This means 2006 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision | 2006 Holden UTE | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Holden |
Model | Vision | UTE |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1899 cc | 3789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 204 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 189 Nm | 305 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1500 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2950 mm |