2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision vs. 2013 Mazda 5

To start off, 2013 Mazda 5 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision would be higher. At 2,489 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda 5 (157 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision. (94 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda 5 weights approximately 601 kg more than 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda 5 (221 Nm) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision. (189 Nm). This means 2013 Mazda 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mercedes-Benz Vision.

Compare all specifications: