2000 Mercury Cougar vs. 1965 Morgan 4
To start off, 2000 Mercury Cougar is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercury Cougar (123 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1965 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1965 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 650 kg more than 1965 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Morgan 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Morgan 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mercury Cougar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mercury Cougar | 1965 Morgan 4 | |
Make | Mercury | Morgan |
Model | Cougar | 4 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 1340 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 55 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2450 mm |