2000 Mercury Cougar vs. 2001 Volvo Hatric
To start off, 2001 Volvo Hatric is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 2,442 cc, 2001 Volvo Hatric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Volvo Hatric (208 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2000 Mercury Cougar. (123 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Volvo Hatric should accelerate faster than 2000 Mercury Cougar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Volvo Hatric weights approximately 141 kg more than 2000 Mercury Cougar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Volvo Hatric (280 Nm) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mercury Cougar. (176 Nm). This means 2001 Volvo Hatric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mercury Cougar. 2001 Volvo Hatric has automatic transmission and 2000 Mercury Cougar has manual transmission. 2000 Mercury Cougar will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Volvo Hatric will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mercury Cougar | 2001 Volvo Hatric | |
Make | Mercury | Volvo |
Model | Cougar | Hatric |
Year Released | 2000 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 2442 cc |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 280 Nm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1451 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2800 mm |