2000 Mercury Cougar vs. 2003 Toyota Condor

To start off, 2003 Toyota Condor is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 2,358 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercury Cougar (123 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2003 Toyota Condor. (113 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 2003 Toyota Condor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota Condor weights approximately 336 kg more than 2000 Mercury Cougar.

Because 2003 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Toyota Condor (195 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mercury Cougar. (176 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Toyota Condor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mercury Cougar.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Mercury Cougar 2003 Toyota Condor
Make Mercury Toyota
Model Cougar Condor
Year Released 2000 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1983 cc 2358 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 123 HP 113 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 176 Nm 195 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2800 RPM
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1310 kg 1646 kg
Vehicle Length 4710 mm 4580 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1330 mm 1940 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2520 mm