2000 Mercury Mountaineer vs. 2011 Peugeot RCZ
To start off, 2011 Peugeot RCZ is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mercury Mountaineer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mercury Mountaineer would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercury Mountaineer (208 HP) has 52 more horse power than 2011 Peugeot RCZ. (156 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercury Mountaineer should accelerate faster than 2011 Peugeot RCZ.
Because 2000 Mercury Mountaineer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Peugeot RCZ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mercury Mountaineer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mercury Mountaineer | 2011 Peugeot RCZ | |
| Make | Mercury | Peugeot |
| Model | Mountaineer | RCZ |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4014 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 156 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4287 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1845 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1359 mm |
