2000 Mercury Sable vs. 1953 Simca Aronde
To start off, 2000 Mercury Sable is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Simca Aronde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Simca Aronde would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercury Sable weights approximately 624 kg more than 1953 Simca Aronde.
Because 1953 Simca Aronde is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Simca Aronde. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mercury Sable | 1953 Simca Aronde | |
| Make | Mercury | Simca |
| Model | Sable | Aronde |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 1220 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1574 kg | 950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4120 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 39 L |
